I was reading through Rachel’s post related to activities for your e-book, and was reflecting on my own experiences developing e-learning courses in various industries, and I thought some of you folks might be interested to hear my perspective on working across industries and about which type of activities worked best for which industry.
For many years I worked in the private sector developing military courseware. Most of these courses were related to aircraft familiarization, component removal/installation, and common core training. Within these programs, the most effective activities, by a landslide, were Electronic Performance Support Systems (EPSS’) as they provided the learner with both just-in-time and practical training for the task to be completed. These EPSS’ worked best for practical training (e.g. component removal/installation procedures), and were very effective at creating concrete learning experiences.
Assessment was most often scenario-based or multiple choice, and of the two, scenario-based assessment activities seemed to be the most effective at ensuring the achievement of learning outcomes.
After spending so much time in the private sector, I switched to post-secondary education. There was a steep learning curve in terms of determining effective communication strategies with faculty (who are very different than military SMEs) and navigating collective agreements, but I’m finally in a good groove and my pedagogical recommendations are more often implemented than not (woohoo!).
Within the academic sector, there is a much broader range of learning activities, and it’s really neat to see what faculty members are doing in their classrooms. There are no EPSS or job aids, but there is group work and forum discussions, and synchronous sessions – oh my!
With some courses, there are still instances of ‘read this, do that multiple choice’ styles, but this is few and far between, as faculty members are revising their learning activities to favour more active learning components (e.g. forum discussions, case studies, and presentations). It’s been really neat to see faculty members guiding their discussions (and sometimes complimenting this guidance with technologies, such as Actively Learn!) instead of lecturing students for 2 hours.
Similar to military training, there is a predominance of self-directed learning as with most online courses, but all online courses have a synchronous requirement, where students must participate in a live session once or twice a week; to accommodate many learners (e.g. those who have scheduling conflicts), these sessions are recorded and can be watched asynchronously at a later time. Additionally, the faculty members are engaging their learners more actively (e.g. guiding forum discussions) than military instructors ever were. Where military training tended to be moving away from instructor-led training in favour of online learning, post-secondary it merely looking to enhance accessibility by creating an equitable learning experience for both on-campus and online students.
- What differences have you seen in learning activities, if you’ve had the opportunity of working across industries?
- Which type of learning activities seem to be working best, and which industry are you seeing these activities implemented?
Leave a Reply